Legislators, Unions Urge Yale: Stand up to Trump
State representatives, the American Association of University Professors (AAUP), and the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) have a message for Yale: Stand up against Trump, and we will stand with you. On May 14, Trump’s Department of Justice (DOJ) alleged that it found Yale discriminated against Asian and white applicants to the Yale School of Medicine, and threatened to extend these allegations to law school and undergraduate admissions as well. These dubious “findings” are part of the Trump administration’s long battle against academic freedom with the intention of inducing a chilling effect on campus speech. In response to these threats of litigation, Yale has the choice to stand up and use its $44 billion endowment to fight for academic freedom, or seek a surrender settlement in response to Trump’s shakedown.
According to a letter from eight State Lawmakers, including New Haven representatives Pat Dillon, Roland Lemar, and Steve Winter, the allegations made by the DOJ are unfounded and need to be challenged. “...capitulating now would constitute a serious abandonment of Yale’s values, be a severe strategic miscalculation, and could jeopardize Yale’s relationship with the State of Connecticut — including state-granted privileges the University has long taken for granted,” reads the letter, which clarifies that such privileges include the university’s special tax-exempt status that could potentially be eliminated.
While Yale leadership could pursue a settlement to get the Trump administration off their back temporarily, surrendering would only provide additional ammunition for Trump to pursue more concessions from higher education, at Yale and beyond. As noted in the lawmakers’ letter, settlements at other universities, including Columbia, have only served as a “springboard for new demands.” Additionally, the AAUP has asserted that a potential Yale settlement would endanger institutions of higher education throughout the state, especially those who lack the financial power to fight the administration in court. The AAUP is prepared to legally challenge the settlement if it occurs.
The national AFT and AFT Connecticut also joined the AAUP in calling on Yale to reject a settlement. While the DOJ claims the allegations against Yale are only about admissions, it represents a continuation of Trump’s intention to limit academic freedom in educational institutions across the country. In a letter issued by the AAUP and AFT, such a settlement would also give the federal government continued leverage over “hiring, curriculum, research, medical practice, campus speech, student discipline, or faculty governance.” As the letter from the CT state lawmakers also noted, “settlements have consistently placed universities — and their leaders and employees personally — in a worse legal position than they occupied under existing law, not a better one.”
If Yale University shows that mere threats of litigation over unproven allegations will lead to preemptive compliance, it would only encourage the Trump administration to continue his anti-education agenda using such threats as a bargaining chip. Trump, in addition to being firmly anti-science, has threatened to abolish the Department of Education. Federal funding has been withdrawn from programs that include crucial medical and climate change research. The administration has also attacked Historically Black Colleges and Universities throughout the country, inflicting them with severe funding cuts and undermining federal student loan programs.
"Even at smaller colleges like Smith, we are paying close attention to the actions by the Yale administration in the face of Trump's escalating threats. Yale's refusal to buckle to illegal demands from the Trump Administration is one all colleges and universities have stakes in supporting. We stand in solidarity with the college communities of workers and students like Yale who have the courage to fight judicial overreach and bullying to want to steal hard-won basic rights, equality and access to educational resources,” Elisabeth Armstrong, the Sydenham Parsons Clark Professor in Women, Gender and Sexuality Studies at Smith College and AAUP member, told the People’s World.
If Yale chooses to stand with its own academic community to fight back against Trump’s demands, it would be using its financial resources and status to not only protect its own students, faculty, and workers, but also the entire system of higher education in the US. When Harvard University joined the AAUP in litigation against the federal government, billions of dollars in frozen funding was restored. State lawmakers have asserted that if Yale would fight as Harvard did, it would almost certainly win. Yale would have the support of the AAUP, the AFT, and CT state lawmakers behind it, should it choose to defend its own principles of academic freedom and institutional independence.