Unions Condemn Lamont Veto of Pro-Worker Bill
Over 500 public and private sector union members from across the state gathered outside the Governor's Mansion on July 16 chanting: “What do we need? SB 8. When do we need it? Now!” Their picket line filled both sides of the street, overshadowing a Yankee Institute mobile billboard flashing the message: “Do Not Pass SB 8”
The bill would allow striking workers to receive unemployment insurance after two weeks. Would Governor Ned Lamont side with the workers who make the economy run, or side with the billionaires who seize all that wealth for themselves?
On June 23 Gov Lamont vetoed SB 8 making his choice clear. He said no to Connecticut workers even though workers in New York and New Jersey have long had this protection.
Union leaders from the Connecticut AFL-CIO, IAM Local 700, UNITE HERE, UFCW Local 371, and SEIU District 1199NE immediately responded..
Wayne McCarthy, President of IAM Local 700 at Pratt & Whitney, just coming off a 23 day strike for wages, pensions and job security emphasized “this legislation is necessary in order to ensure that companies enter into negotiations ready to bargain in good faith.”
“If SB 8 was enacted prior to our strike, there would have been a strong chance that the strike could have been averted all together,” said McCarthy. “Minimally, Pratt and Whitney’s executives would have reached out much earlier to resolve our labor dispute.”
The Connecticut AFL-CIO organized hundreds of testimonies, calls, visits and rallies. “This veto sends a clear message: Gov. Lamont is more concerned with protecting corporate profits than supporting the working people who make our economy run,” said president Ed Hawthorne. “I’d like to remind Gov. Lamont that Pratt & Whitney, Electric Boat and other large corporations are not his constituents. The thousands of hardworking people who work there are.”
Underscoring this critical moment Hawthorne added, “Protecting working people in our state has only become more urgent since the Trump Administration has gutted the NLRB and severely weakened the ability to enforce existing worker protections.”