Reaction
in Connecticut and across the country was instant when the White
House ordered an immediate halt to federal grant programs,
endangering thousands in an act of open class warfare.
“People’s
lives and their livelihoods are at stake,” said Rep. Rosa DeLauro,
ranking Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee. “The
Constitution makes it clear: The power of the purse resides with the
Appropriations Committee.” She caled the vicious move
“nothing less than highway robbery,” and “President Trumpt's
theft of taxpayer dollars.”
Connecticut
is one of 21 states filing a lawsuit to end the theft. Attorney
General William Tong called the act an “arbitrary and capricious
order” violating the separation of powers.
Connecticut
for All, a large labor-community-faith coalition of many
organizations that provide basic services said, “Despite being
temporarily blocked by a D.C. federal judge, this decision risks
disrupting essential programs that support our local governments,
educational institutions, and community services, which rely heavily
on federal funding to meet the needs of our communities.”
At
stake are Women, Infants and Children (WIC); Title IX; special
education funds; Head Start, home energy rebates; housing for the
elderly and disabled; most programs under the Bipartisan
Infrastructure Law; veteran programs; the Crime Victims Fund;
community health centers; substance abuse prevention and more.
“Over
30,000 members of SEIU 1199NE are ready to stand up against this
threat, as we have done throughout our history,” said Rob Baril,
President of SEIU 1199, “ This latest threat from the
administration endangers funding for hospitals, nursing homes, state
agencies, and community programs across Connecticut. It is a direct
attack on some of our most vulnerable.”
“These
programs provide a lifeline to families struggling to make ends meet,
ensuring they have the support needed to put food on the table and
keep their families stable,” said Karime Pimentel, Naugatuck Valley
Project, “Removing these resources only deepens poverty,
exacerbates inequality, and places unnecessary strain on local
communities and services. At a time when many are still recovering
from economic hardships, these cuts are not only heartless—they are
short-sighted and harmful to the very fabric of our society."
“Title
I funds are crucially important to sustain the impactful work that
takes place in our schools throughout the state of CT,” said Leslie
Blatteau, President, New Haven Federation of Teachers Local 933, and
AFT-CT Divisional Vice President for PreK12, “If these funds are
frozen, our students’ academic, social, and emotional wellbeing
will be at risk. As we continue to prioritize our students’ needs,
we know we need more staff and more opportunities, not threats of
layoffs and shuttered programs as a result of President Trump’s
overreach.”
“The
housing market as we know it depends on federal housing subsidies,”
said Hannah Srajer, President, Connecticut Tenants Union, “Sudden
removal of federal funding to critical housing programs–including
homelessness services, rental assistance, public housing, legal aid,
and more–will force millions more tenants into eviction and
homelessness, leaving huge portions of the working class even more
vulnerable to predation, deprivation, and, frankly, death. Tenants
must prepare for the worst by organizing ourselves into unions
resilient enough to combat the anti-tenant, anti-poor, anti-working
class agenda of this administration.”
“Federal
funding is critical to the future of our early education and climate
change mitigation. Our Care4Kids and Headstart program provide vital
education opportunities that give children a strong foundation for
success while ensuring parents can participate in the workforce,”
said Travis Woodward, President of CSEA SEIU Local 2001 representing
childcare workers, public school employees and state employees, “Work
across our state agencies also rely on these federal grants,
including at the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection
and the Agricultural Station. Without federal grants, Connecticut
risks the well-being of our children and the safety of our
communities and well being of our beautiful state”
“These
programs provide a lifeline to families struggling to make ends meet,
ensuring they have the support needed to put food on the table and
keep their families stable,” said Karime Pimentel, Naugatuck Valley
Project, “Removing these resources only deepens poverty,
exacerbates inequality, and places unnecessary strain on local
communities and services. At a time when many are still recovering
from economic hardships, these cuts are not only heartless—they are
short-sighted and harmful to the very fabric of our society."
“Cutting funding for school lunch programs would be a
direct attack on the health and well-being of our children,”
explained Isabel Rivera, Fight for HPS community coalition, “These
programs ensure that every student, regardless of their background,
has access to nutritious meals that are essential for learning and
growth. For many in our schools this is the only meal they will have.
The impact of these cuts will be felt long after the school bell
rings, as they set back efforts to build a healthier, more equitable
future for all."